Kattlarv 2021-11-23 09:14:05

You mean in the "Not including visible cumshots for female characters" part?
Then that is female ejaculation I am referring too.

If a porn piece has excessive male ejaculations. Then, it's kinda safe to assume there would be visible female orgasms too. You can't really go over the top orgasms for one genital. And then just "imply" it for the other. That clashes heavily in the style of the game.

Kattlarv 2022-01-01 12:38:27

I certainly do~
That's how critique works. Like: I'm a terrible cook. But, I can still point out if someone majorly fucks up their cooking. Being bad at something doesn't exclude you from pointing out others being shit at it. Sometimes, it even encourages it as you know what bad looks like.

Also: This is mostly of a breakdown of how this trope is funny. Not that the trope is bad.
Though yes, I do touch on people being lazy fucks as well.

Plus: Most of the "WTF inducing shit" as you put it: Is LITERALLY just the same shit other people do. Except: I reverse the roles, so its a female instead of a male doing it. More often than not: This is done in a satirical manner. To point out how stupid the original is. But, most people seem incapable to grasp that.

Being too lazy to learn how to draw proper female anatomy isn't a free pass. As: Like I've proven time and again: NO-ONE accepts when an artist is THAT lazy with male anatomy. Yet: SO many of those artists *demands* a free pass because "I draw penis good!". To which: Yeah, they do. They're still getting a shit score due to the crap pussy. A 5/5 dick with a 0/5 pussy does NOT result in a 5/5 score.