00:00
00:00
Kattlarv
Has pet reptile.

Age 32, Female

Joined on 6/7/12

Level:
15
Exp Points:
2,386 / 2,500
Exp Rank:
24,660
Vote Power:
5.72 votes
Rank:
Town Watch
Global Rank:
64,539
Blams:
2
Saves:
112
B/P Bonus:
2%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
35

Why Do People Lie About Edits?

Posted by Kattlarv - June 18th, 2020


Seriously, I keep running into this more and more.

And I literally have 0 clue WHY people do it.


Like... I know many people are kinda thick as a brick.

But we can literally have someone with the username... just trying to be sure this isn't an actual username, so: "I-Draw-Hyper-Dogdicks-On-Anime-girls".


And: This person can draw a one anime girl slapping another in the face with said hyper dog dick, and a third one saying "That is KNOT very nice!". They then call this "the edit". A spur of the moment picture they decided to "uncharacteristically" do an edit to.


And then post the "original" which has the dick layer hidden. So... you have a character hit in the face by... nothing. Another character with their pants down and... a Ken doll crotch. And a third character citing the "That is KNOT very nice!" line. NONE of this makes ANY fucking sense without the "edit".


And people believe that shit. They just, straight up: Face value that that shit is a random afterthought "edit" of the "original" they had drawn.

I mean: Seriously... wtf is up with some people?


It's kinda on the same level of worthless as a large chunk of porn games that claim to have a female PC or lesbian scenes... Like: Sure buddy. You just happen to be 2 years into development with 50 scenes, and 0 of them happen to be lesbian/with the female PC.


Tags:

6

Comments

im confused

About what exactly?
I know I'm not the best at articulating, but I thought it was pretty straightforward: I'm tired of people lying about their edits being the original picture.

@Gimmick @Kattlarv So if I understand...an artist uploads one picture, a reviewer mentions something about the picture, and then the artist uploads another version so that their review makes no sense anymore?

No, let me try to explain: Just for example, they upload the picture: "Batman with a Gun."
That shows Batman holding his hand in the air, grabbing... nothing. But you can clearly see that he is supposed to be holding something...

And underneath that picture (or a separate post) they have "Batman with a Gun, Edit" in which he IS holding a gun. And the artist goes "Yeah, so after finishing drawing my Batman picture, I decided to go back and make a little edit, and add a gun.".

Actually, let me give visual aid: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Cyt5wvcVHE4/maxresdefault.jpg
The artist, claims that the left picture, is an edit. And the right picture, is the original, intended picture they planned to draw all along. Despite you know... it doesn't really serve any purpose or make any sense without the "edit".

Ah, I see. Yeah that doesn't make any sense.

Yeah, and people do it all the time... no clue why.

Like... why not just say the "edit" is the original?