00:00
00:00
Kattlarv
Has pet reptile.

Age 32, Female

Joined on 6/7/12

Level:
15
Exp Points:
2,382 / 2,500
Exp Rank:
24,616
Vote Power:
5.72 votes
Rank:
Town Watch
Global Rank:
64,522
Blams:
2
Saves:
112
B/P Bonus:
2%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
35

Price For Incompetence?

Posted by Kattlarv - October 21st, 2019


While I am on a roll. 

Let's talk about an objective fact: A LOT of artists, try to get a free pass on being inept. Primarily: Only on female genital anatomy. 


To explain it plainly: (and: do it how MOST artists operate) Say you just for example: You want a ref sheet for your twin doggos. One male, one female. And, just for example: Say it will cost 80 per sheet. Seems fine so far.


Now, for both characters, you will get back, side and front view, all that standard stuff. So lets skip past that. Now: We come to the genitalia. The male can pick ANY dick design you desire. Horse? Dog? Dragon? 11 dicks? Hyper? Anything goes. They have a folder of 109 different dicks they've drawn. If they can't draw it, they WILL learn. Bending over backwards to get you just what you want. Great. You will get: flaccid, erect, side view. All and all, they will put around 4-8 additional hours.


Then we get to your female char. They ask about the front, side back all that shiz. And then... you get the "finished" product. No asking about vag or anything. You just get the same char, except without genital refs and with a " | " hastily slapped between the legs. And now, for a partial piss take, and some comedy, I will paraphrase an exchange: "This looks great but, you never asked me about their junk? - Oh! I'm so sorry, did they also have a dick? - ...no? - Oh, then what's the problem? Their pussy is right there. - That's not how it looks though. - What do you mean? There's one pussy. - No, theirs look canine, to match their brother. They are the same species after all." and I'll just skip the rant about how "it's zoophilia!" and "it's their preference/style!" or my personal favorite: "I heard what you said you wanted, but I thought I'd improve it. It looks better this way."


So, in short TL-DR: STOP charging for a service you can't provide.

If you spend hours extra on dicks, and can't draw a SINGLE flipping pussy. Don't charge the same for them. If you can't offer or provide ANYTHING. Don't charge as if you can. Either charge more for males, or less for females. 


It's not rocket science. Since that's EXACTLY what people demand if you can't draw their dicks properly. Or: They simply refuse to do business all together. But that's not "allowed" to do in case someone can't draw proper cunts.Then that person is just being "rude" or "picky".


Please stop with this "Any species, any gender" bullshit YCH if you aren't willing or able to draw it. The shitty "I never said any species OF any gender." excuse was old 30 years ago. Either advertise honestly, or admit to being unable to draw pussy for shit. Yes, it can be your "choice" to be worthless at drawing them. But that doesn't give a free pass. All that says is that you choose to be crap at it.That's nothing to be proud of. And this is a fact, since: The fandom happily bullied and laughed at people that drew equines, that didn't learn how to draw horse dick. Then, suddenly the "it's my preference" apologetics wasn't good enough.It was in fact: Unacceptable.


While I'm not allowed to call anyone out: A certain convicted criminal, that's a pathological lair and enjoys discriminating towards females is a big fan of ALL of this bs.

On the flip side: There IS a really good artist that handles this correctly on FA. I won't name numbers since then they are easy to pick out. But I CAN say that they charge around 25 % less for their females. Simply because: They cannot draw pussy on par with their penises. They barely know one design, and they are aware off, and admit that. And thus: Charge accordingly. 


It'd be lovely if we stop normalizing this. And stop paying more for less, just because a character doesn't have a dick, and the artist is too lazy to improve. (One certain lazy hack animator ACTUALLY charges more for their females, despite being unable to provide acceptable detail. To quote one of my favorite burns towards them: "I have to admit that this pussy looks like someone accidentally slipped with his stylus pen on that area and forgot to erase it." and they, just for example: Charge $100 for male or female. BUT: They ONLY take commissions in pairs. (IE: minimum 1 male 1 female.) And what they do is: charge 70 for the male, and 130 for the female. But: They have people split the bill. This is because to quote "I don't want people to have to pay more just because they get a better service." so, instead they... make someone else cover the extra costs. Isn't that generous of them? Who wouldn't want to pay $30 extra to cover the cost of someone else's commission?) 


To be clear: I'm not asking for a 1:1 ratio here. As ALWAYS and like I've ALWAYS argued for: It should only be "close enough". And it should be by the artists own standards.Like I've always judged art. By their OWN standard. If the artist considers X to be unacceptable, I don't let them get away with doing the Y counterpart.


But, for example: Say it takes an artist 4 hours to draw a dick. If it takes them 30 seconds to draw a pussy... then no. That's not okay. Since, simple: NO-ONE would be okay with paying the same for a 4 hour pussy, as for a 30 second dick.If people aren't okay with X and refuse to feel cheated. Then no-one that gets the counterpart should have to accept it "just because". If the norm doesn't have to accept bullshit and bitch and moan when something exclusively directly negatively affects them, then we have the same rights. 


However: If they take 4 hours with that dick, but 3,5 hours with the pussy... or heck, even 2 hours in some cases: Then: Sure. It's close enough within margin, as long as it looks remotely similar. 

But asking people to pay the same for being allowed to pick basically ANYTHING versus being allowed NOTHING, no choices, no effort. Just a shoddy excuse for a vulva. Just: No. NONE of their customers would accept that if the roles were reversed. And it's been proven time and time again that the snide "nobody cares" remarks are just fake. Those exact same people are the ones throwing tantrums when the things they claim "nobody cares about" aren't exactly to their liking. (Like: Saying nobody cares if a horse has a human genitalia. We added a human dick to a horse. And those guys screeched for months about it. Clearly a sign of how little they care. In fact: They cared so little they only bawled multiple times per week about it.)


Porn could honestly do a bit more with the golden rule...

Like honestly: Just don't be a hypocrite. It's not fucking hard.


Tags:

6

Comments

Ignore this mook people, it's just another man hating feminazi that's venting about her lack of a love life because of her terrible personality.

Ignore this muppet. It's just another asshole trying to excuse the actions of convicted criminals and people too lazy to put effort into their work.

It's people like you that defend a companies "right" to manipulate children and vulnerable teens+adults into spending hundreds and thousands on loot boxes because "they're optional" and YOU personally aren't negatively affected by them.

And, when you run into irrefutable facts that hurt your feelings, you toss a fit and start chucking out buzz words in a hope it will distract ignorant and gullible people.
I could chuck out that you're just "another triggered snowflake incel, that's mad that his 'offers' of 'giving femoids permission' to suck his dick IF they buy him dinner hasn't been picked up since he posted the add two days ago, and therefore: has concluded that all women are whores."

Except: That wouldn't get us anywhere. But that's what cretin like you are after. Because you hate the truth, and just want to uphold a status quo of fraud and discrimination, because YOU aren't negatively affected. Despite the fact people like you throw massive hissy fits whenever someone remotely goes against the grain. Like: When I make a dominant female instead of a futa. You guys roll on the ground bawling that I'm "harassing you" because I COULD have made a futa. But as I didn't: It was an malicious act against YOU specifically. But whenever you pull the same shit, it's "just my preference".

I don't get why you're upset; it's supply, and demand. If people vote with their wallet to hire artist good at drawing dicks, and pussy then that's up to them, let the market dictate it. If you want both drawn good then hire/ teach people how to draw it.

If people cared about how good the pussy was drawn we'd see people specializing in that area, it's only logical the results that earn the most profitability will be focused on.