@Kattlarv The fact you responded with a full set of paragraphs is just sad. I’ve seen lazy artists before, and the people you ‘criticize’ are not. Having something be realistic or anatomically accurate doesn’t automatically make it good. Having something look cartoony or exaggerated doesn’t automatically make it bad. In other words: keep your own opinions to yourself and stop spamming people with your garbage.
Has pet reptile.
Age 33, Female
Joined on 6/7/12
- Level:
- 16
- Exp Points:
- 2,656 / 2,840
- Exp Rank:
- 23,308
- Vote Power:
- 5.80 votes
- Rank:
- Town Watch
- Global Rank:
- 63,926
- Blams:
- 2
- Saves:
- 115
- B/P Bonus:
- 2%
- Whistle:
- Normal
- Medals:
- 35
RedNileKing
You have no right criticizing other people’s art when your own is some of the worst and most ‘WTF’ inducing shit I’ve ever seen.
Kattlarv
I certainly do~
That's how critique works. Like: I'm a terrible cook. But, I can still point out if someone majorly fucks up their cooking. Being bad at something doesn't exclude you from pointing out others being shit at it. Sometimes, it even encourages it as you know what bad looks like.
Also: This is mostly of a breakdown of how this trope is funny. Not that the trope is bad.
Though yes, I do touch on people being lazy fucks as well.
Plus: Most of the "WTF inducing shit" as you put it: Is LITERALLY just the same shit other people do. Except: I reverse the roles, so its a female instead of a male doing it. More often than not: This is done in a satirical manner. To point out how stupid the original is. But, most people seem incapable to grasp that.
Being too lazy to learn how to draw proper female anatomy isn't a free pass. As: Like I've proven time and again: NO-ONE accepts when an artist is THAT lazy with male anatomy. Yet: SO many of those artists *demands* a free pass because "I draw penis good!". To which: Yeah, they do. They're still getting a shit score due to the crap pussy. A 5/5 dick with a 0/5 pussy does NOT result in a 5/5 score.