@Gimmick @Kattlarv So if I understand...an artist uploads one picture, a reviewer mentions something about the picture, and then the artist uploads another version so that their review makes no sense anymore?
Has pet reptile.
Age 33, Female
Joined on 6/7/12
- Level:
- 16
- Exp Points:
- 2,574 / 2,840
- Exp Rank:
- 23,625
- Vote Power:
- 5.77 votes
- Rank:
- Town Watch
- Global Rank:
- 63,796
- Blams:
- 2
- Saves:
- 115
- B/P Bonus:
- 2%
- Whistle:
- Normal
- Medals:
- 35
Comments
No, let me try to explain: Just for example, they upload the picture: "Batman with a Gun."
That shows Batman holding his hand in the air, grabbing... nothing. But you can clearly see that he is supposed to be holding something...
And underneath that picture (or a separate post) they have "Batman with a Gun, Edit" in which he IS holding a gun. And the artist goes "Yeah, so after finishing drawing my Batman picture, I decided to go back and make a little edit, and add a gun.".
Actually, let me give visual aid: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Cyt5wvcVHE4/maxresdefault.jpg
The artist, claims that the left picture, is an edit. And the right picture, is the original, intended picture they planned to draw all along. Despite you know... it doesn't really serve any purpose or make any sense without the "edit".
Ah, I see. Yeah that doesn't make any sense.
Yeah, and people do it all the time... no clue why.
Like... why not just say the "edit" is the original?
Gimmick
im confused
Kattlarv
About what exactly?
I know I'm not the best at articulating, but I thought it was pretty straightforward: I'm tired of people lying about their edits being the original picture.