@SA72 @Kattlarv Where do I even begin with this? This is one of the stupidest essays I've ever read in my life.
First of all, don't assume I'm a futa fanatic or that my "feelings are hurt" because neither of those are true at all. You just came up with that narrative yourself because you were called out for making a shitty review.
And second of all, I will repeat this again.. You are rating THIS CONTENT. You are not meant to be judging it based off of previous works. This idea of "what we can expect next" shouldn't effect your overall rating. If you're going to pretend to be a critic at least fucking do it right.
I don't even want to bother going over all the other pointless nonsense you're talking about which has almost nothing to do with this at all but you have then nerve to tell me I'm fucking up the rating system. No dude. YOU are fucking up the rating system.
You literally have nothing better to do aside from pretending to be a critic on this site and you have the most shitty rating system I have ever seen. You're bringing down peoples ratings over stupid shit like this.
Plenty of people gave this animation 5 stars and not because they think it's perfect or flawless but because they enjoyed it. You're so focused on this stupid fucking critic mentality of yours that you think everything needs a critical analysis. This is why NG still hasn't become an artist friendly platform because of people like you who constantly do dumb shit like this thinking that you're contributing anything. Calling an animation "pretty good" and giving it a one star rating is fucking stupid and I actually can't believe anyone would be dumb enough to do that.
If you care enough that you're practically obsessed with this artist and all their previous works then maybe you should be more understanding and realize that what you're doing is fucking them over. If you really want to support them then stop giving them completely unreasonable ratings like one star and then giving absolute bullshit reasons for it.
SA72
Terrible rating system that doesn't encourage improvement at all.
Kattlarv
Not like leaving 5 stars, with jack shit to say, does anything.
You're just leaving a "This is perfect in EVERY way and the artist CANNOT improve."
You fully ignore any and all errors and inconsistency. Seemingly because it hurts you feelings.
To reply to your sham review:
"Long ago" a few months isn't really "long ago". Especially with no visible improvement. There's been no MASSIVE overhaul in their style. Especially as they managed to draw the vag WORSE than before.
I DID rate the recent piece. And as said: They flunked on the design of the female, even harder than normal. Just because you are obsessed by hyper dick, doesn't give EVERYTHING else a free pass. Also: Rating by Earlier work is vital for context. As: It shows WHAT you should be able to expect from an artist. I've had artists brag about how they spend 4 hours drawing each penis they do. And they then get upset when they get a bad score for the 30 second vag they copy pasted from an old drawing. Being lazy/inept doesn't give a free pass just because they are good at something else.
And it IS inconsistent when his dick changes in between every animation. But: It is also mismatching, as the anatomy does not carry over. Hyper is not an inherent issue. But when you flip from micro to hyper on a dime, on the supposed same character... I rate on this, based on that so far: Every. Single. Artist and fan, has thought this looks retarded, if the roles are reversed. Much like I assume you would, if the character had a massive, knee-length flopping pussy as female. But then a tiny shota penis when futa. Much akin to how people think it looks stupid to give an antrho a human penis, but not a human vag. Again: I judge people based on their OWN standards.
I can agree that "unfocused" is a bit vague. But the animation is a bit all over the place. The characters are kinda just "there". And yes. They more or less literally didn't draw the pussy. And the "angle excuse" doesn't work, when the artist drew the dude with a hyper dick. Along with how oddly the buttocks protrude. Combining bending over backwards, with half-assing isn't a good look. "Clearly an angle" doesn't work when they've drawn "angles" in prior work, where dicks and balls shoot out in all directions, solely to be visible. Special pleading isn't a good look.
And no. The 1 star may be harsh, but its fair. You're ignoring ALL context, solely to be a fanboy. YOU should stop rating if all you do is give 5 stars, or 0 stars. It's people like you that clog up the system and fuck over ratings. As a 9 second 3D animation with a wobbly hyper dick that clips through the skin, has the same 5 star rating as a 2 minute 3D animation someone put effort into.
->
That said: This IS on the better side. It's just half-baked/undercooked. They went all in, no bars hold on the dude. But then kinda half-assed on the girl. In a kinda "She's there too I guess..." it just cuts the overall quality down too much for me. They put ALL that effort into the dude, and then just kinda did a budget run on the girl.
->
Let me explain this in a way you might understand: And: I WILL be exaggerating for effect. Let's take this animation as example: Say it's exactly the same, BUT: It has sound. Of a guy having explosive diarrhea. Would you still just go "Mmm, yes. 5/5, flawless!"? Or would you go "This looks really good. But... what the fuck is up with the sound?". As said: It's NOWHERE near that bad. I only used it as an example to get the point across. As: it IS pretty good. They simply didn't put their back into half of it.
Also: Regarding edits: If you make an edit, you make a CONSCIOUS choice to do that. And, I think you might have heard the saying: "If you're not gonna do it properly, don't bother at all." and I can easily mention several dozen artists that are lazy hacks in this regard. They spend HOURS drawing the penis for the male version. And then: Either copy pastes an old vag, or spend around 2 minutes on it to shit something out. Just to "have more content". It's kinda the equivalent of an asset flip, game wise. Except you just purchase one of those game engines with a demo build, rename it and sell it as a full game.
->
And if we take the female edit of Capy: It IS actually good. It keeps the same energy of the original. (Which I put at around 4/5) They actually put some effort into it. It's not just a "hide dick layer, draw a squiggly line." like most do. The female version does however end at 2,5/5. Since they kinda cba to draw the vag. There is *something* there, which keeps it from going lower. But as said: It keeps the same energy, the same "oomph", its just lackluster genitalia that kept that one from going higher. If they insist on drawing both futa and female, put some work into learning to draw both. (Like: take their incubus and homestuck edit pic. GREAT work between the two. Made adjustments between the penis and tentacle. They simply are a bit behind on their females. Nothing more complicated.
Ps: It's also hard to take you serious, when you seem to just be another futa fanatic throwing a tantrum over the world not revolving around futa... despite said fact you'd likely be giving this animation a 0 if the roles were reversed.